Himachal HC Strikes Down Parliamentary Secretaries’ Appointments, Calls for Swift Withdrawal of Perks!

Priyanshu Kotapalli

himachal-hc-strikes-down-parliamentary-secretaries’-appointments,-calls-for-swift-withdrawal-of-perks!

Himachal Pradesh High Court Overturns Parliamentary Secretaries’ Appointments

In a significant ruling that poses challenges ‍for⁢ Chief Minister Sukhvinder Singh Sukhu, the Himachal Pradesh High Court has invalidated the appointments of six parliamentary secretaries. The‍ court deemed ⁤the legislation facilitating these appointments as unconstitutional and mandated an immediate cessation of all associated benefits and privileges.

Advertisements

Court’s Ruling and Implications

Justice Bipin Chander Negi, in his judgment, characterized these positions as “usurpers of ​public property,” emphasizing that​ all perks‌ should be revoked⁤ without delay. The ⁤court ⁢specifically annulled the Himachal Pradesh Parliamentary Secretaries (Appointment, Salaries, Allowances, Powers, ‍Privileges and Amendments) Act of 2006.

Earlier this year in January 2023, the​ state government​ had appointed six members from Congress to serve​ as chief parliamentary secretaries. These individuals included Sunder Singh Thakur⁤ from Kullu Assembly Constituency; Mohan Lal Brakta representing Rohru Assembly Constituency in Shimla district; Ram Kumar​ Chaudhary from Doon Assembly Constituency in Solan district; Ashish Butail‌ from Palampur Assembly Constituency; Kishori Lal from Baijnath Assembly Constituency in Kangra district; and Sanjay Awasthi hailing from Arki Assembly Constituency also located in Solan district.

Legal Challenge by Opposition

The ⁣appointment ⁣process faced legal scrutiny when twelve ​BJP MLAs filed a ⁢petition against it⁢ in the High Court. They contended that the state government overstepped its authority by creating new legislative roles not explicitly mentioned within constitutional provisions.

The petition underscored Articles 178 and 187⁤ of the Constitution which delineate “Officers ‌of the State Legislature.” According⁣ to these ⁤articles, only three official roles are recognized: Speaker, Deputy Speaker, and Secretariat Staff. This legal framework raises questions about ⁣any additional positions being established without proper constitutional backing.

Current ‌Context and Future Considerations

This ruling⁤ not only impacts those directly involved but also sets a precedent regarding legislative appointments across India. As⁣ political dynamics continue to evolve within⁢ Himachal Pradesh—where governance often intertwines ‍with party ​politics—the implications for future administrative decisions remain⁤ uncertain.

With ongoing discussions about governance structures at⁤ both state and national levels gaining traction among political analysts, this case could influence how similar situations are approached elsewhere. It serves as ‌a reminder for lawmakers to adhere strictly to constitutional guidelines when considering new legislative roles or amendments to existing laws.

In light of this development, observers will be keenly watching how Chief ⁢Minister Sukhu’s administration responds moving forward—particularly regarding compliance with judicial directives while navigating party expectations amidst potential electoral repercussions.

Leave a Comment