US Lawmaker Urges Valve to Pull Controversial ‘Oct. 7’ Game from Steam

Ananya Upadhyay

us-lawmaker-urges-valve-to-pull-controversial-‘oct.-7’-game-from-steam

U.S. Representative ‌Ritchie Torres (D-NY) is urging Valve to remove the⁣ contentious video​ game Fursan al-Aqsa: The ‌Knights of the Al-Aqsa Mosque from its Steam platform. This game​ allows players to⁣ assume the role of a ⁤Palestinian resistance fighter, ‌which has‍ sparked⁣ significant debate.

Developed by Brazilian creator Nidal Nijm, ⁣ Fursan al-Aqsa ⁤has already‌ faced removal from Steam ​in various countries, including the United⁢ Kingdom. This action followed a request from the U.K. Counter-Terrorism Internet Referral Unit, as reported⁢ by 404 Media. Nijm​ indicated⁣ that the game is‍ also blocked ⁢throughout the European Union due to‌ violations ‌flagged by France’s⁤ cybercrime unit. According ‍to an email shared with Polygon, Valve cited a breach⁢ of Article 3 of Regulation (EU) 2021/784 concerning “the dissemination‌ of terrorist content‍ online.”

Advertisements

Although released in‌ 2022, Fursan al-Aqsa remained relatively obscure until​ it gained attention when ⁢Libs of TikTok shared gameplay footage on X (formerly⁤ Twitter). The post described how players could ​simulate being ⁣a Hamas operative attacking Jewish individuals ⁤in Jerusalem⁣ while chanting “Allahu Akbar.” In November,​ Nijm introduced an update titled “Operation al-Aqsa Flood Update,” ⁤which references Hamas’ assault on Israel ‍on October 7th through scenes depicting Palestinian⁢ fighters paragliding into an Israeli‍ military installation. While Nijm’s ⁢Steam page does ⁢not explicitly mention Hamas, it features⁣ characters adorned‍ with green headbands associated⁢ with​ the ‌group.

In his correspondence with Valve—shared via Polygon—Torres condemned Fursan al-Aqsa, stating that ​it “glorifies barbaric violence and terror against Jews.” He‍ argued that by hosting this game,‍ Valve becomes complicit in normalizing extreme ⁢forms‌ of ‌antisemitic violence and terror⁢ such as beheadings and suicide bombings linked to events like ⁤those‌ occurring on October ⁣7th.⁣ Torres is ⁤advocating ⁢for its removal from ‍Steam within U.S. borders.

Nijm contends there exists a double⁢ standard regarding media treatment between his creation and mainstream military shooters like Call of Duty. He ⁢expressed via direct message on X: “While ⁣my game ⁣may not technically compete with Call of Duty, its message addresses crucial issues.” He ‌questioned why major studios can produce controversial ⁣games deemed ⁣artistic while he faces censorship ‌accusations for creating Fursan al-Aqsa, labeled as ‌‘terrorist propaganda.’

He pointed out how ‍war scenarios are ⁢often ‌portrayed in popular⁣ titles such as ⁤Call of Duty ‌where players engage in real-life ⁤conflicts using actual ​weapons—sometimes even rewarded for employing incendiary‍ devices like⁤ white phosphorus‍ against large groups. Historically speaking, Arabs have frequently been depicted as ‍antagonists within these military-themed games.

Rejecting claims⁢ that his work promotes​ terrorism propaganda, Nijm ‍stated: “Fursan al-Aqsa merely presents⁣ another perspective—the narrative surrounding Palestinian​ resistance—and acknowledges that international law​ recognizes oppressed⁤ populations’ right​ to resist occupation.”

As for Valve’s response regarding this ​matter? They have yet to provide any‌ comments following inquiries ‍made⁢ by Polygon.

Despite generating considerable controversy since ⁢its launch, ⁢ Fursan al-Aqsa has struggled to ‌attract more‍ than ​25‍ concurrent players at⁣ any ⁢given time since debuting‍ on Steam; player counts fluctuated after​ clips were shared online—from eight concurrent⁤ users rising briefly to sixteen—before plummeting back down again afterward. ‍Following its ban in November across U.K., ⁤player numbers peaked‌ at twenty-five ⁢early December after previously reaching six concurrent users ​during October’s heightening tensions over Middle‌ Eastern ‍conflicts.

Interestingly enough though low engagement levels persist overall; despite ⁤having only garnered ‌around six hundred sixty-four reviews thus⁢ far—with ⁣just ⁣two hundred fifty-seven reviewers playing longer than one hour—the title maintains an “overwhelmingly positive”​ rating​ among those who did take part.

This⁣ article has been updated⁣ recently reflecting⁤ new developments concerning‌ EU restrictions‍ along with additional insights provided directly from ⁤Nidal Nijm himself.

Leave a Comment