Kingspan’s Role in the Grenfell Tower Tragedy: An Inquiry into Accountability
The Grenfell Tower fire, which occurred in June 2017 and claimed the lives of 72 individuals, has led to significant scrutiny of various stakeholders involved in the construction and maintenance of the building. Among these is Kingspan, one of Ireland’s largest manufacturers of building materials. As the public inquiry continues to unfold, Kingspan is expected to face substantial criticism regarding its practices and products.
Acknowledgment of Shortcomings
Kingspan has publicly acknowledged certain “process and conduct shortcomings” that have emerged during the inquiry. Despite this admission, the company maintains that none of these issues directly contributed to the catastrophic failures that allowed for such a rapid spread of flames throughout Grenfell Tower.
Cladding Concerns: A Catalyst for Disaster
The primary factor behind this tragic event was identified as non-compliant cladding on Grenfell Tower. This cladding facilitated an alarming rate at which fire could engulf the structure. A small quantity of Kooltherm K15 insulation—produced by Kingspan—was utilized without their knowledge or involvement in its installation or design.
Critical Evidence Presented at Inquiry
Throughout the inquiry process, evidence surfaced highlighting troubling aspects related to Kingspan’s business operations. Richard Millett KC, leading counsel for the inquiry, accused Kingspan of engaging in “malpractice” concerning their development and marketing strategies for K15 insulation. Allegations included misleading information about its suitability for use on high-rise buildings.
Particularly concerning were findings from tests conducted between 2005 and 2007 on K15 insulation that raised serious questions about compliance with safety regulations.
Key Findings from Testimonies
Several critical points emerged during testimonies:
- In 2005, Kingspan conducted a large-scale fire test on K15 which passed; however, it involved non-weatherproofed cement fiber cladding panels deemed unsuitable for actual high-rise applications.
- Despite altering production methods after initial testing results were obtained—which later resulted in disastrous outcomes—the company continued promoting K15 as safe for tall structures.
- Internal communications revealed concerns among staff regarding potential risks associated with using K15 on high-rises; one technical manager expressed anxiety over a hypothetical scenario involving a fire spreading up a tower.
- In 2007, further tests focused solely on foil coverings rather than comprehensive assessments across all components; employees reportedly joked about deceptive practices within their testing protocols.
A Tragedy That Should Have Been Prevented
In September 2021’s closing remarks at the inquiry session, Kingspan stated unequivocally that “the Grenfell Tower fire was a tragedy that should never have happened.” The company expressed support for ongoing investigations aimed at uncovering what went wrong during this disaster while reiterating confidence in K15’s safety when installed correctly.
Headquartered in County Cavan with approximately 23,000 employees worldwide and valued around €15 billion—Eugene Murtagh remains its largest shareholder—the company’s future may hinge significantly upon how it addresses these allegations moving forward.
For those interested in delving deeper into this complex issue surrounding construction safety standards and accountability post-Grenfell tragedy can explore BBC Radio 4’s podcast titled Grenfell: Building a Disaster, which provides an extensive examination into matters raised throughout this ongoing inquiry process.
I’m Sneha, a new and enthusiastic content writer with a passion for creating engaging and impactful content. I craft high-quality articles, blog-posts and web content that captivate readers and boost engagement. Let’s bring your ideas to life with words. When not in front of a back-lit device, I dabble in paints, pencil and paper.
